Legal Opinion

Horn v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1949No. 5162PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

This case comes to us by certiorari to review an award by The Industrial Commission of Arizona on behalf of respondent Velma Ruess.

The petitioners, Sarah and Marion Horn, doing business as Horn’s, operated a ladies’ clothing store in Tucson, Arizona, where respondent Ruess was employed and they were not covered by workmen’s compensation insurance.

On March 12, 1948, respondent Haims that: “I was carrying clothes with both hands. I slipped on a sequin which had fallen on the floor. My knee struck a full box of wire hangers and I fell forward striking the top of my head against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Owl Drug Co. v. CrandallArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Marshall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Craig v. De BergeArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Western Truck Lines, Ltd. v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Russell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Bolduc v. MARCALUS MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
  5. Mengel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API