Legal Opinion

Craig v. De Berge

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1948No. 5012PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Ralph D. Craig, petitioner, has brought this matter here by writ of certiorari to have reviewed an award made by the Industrial Commission of Arizona (hereafter termed the Commission) on November 19, 1946, (supplemented by a nunc pro tunc order of December 5, 1946, making a slight adjustment in amounts) denying the petitioner further compensation. A petition for rehearing was granted and on May 27, 1947, a final order was entered affirming the amended decision of November 19, 1946. It is only these awards that are now before us for consideration. The respondent employer makes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ison v. Western Vegetable DistributorsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Blankenship v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Caekos v. Stanley Fruit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Jones v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Treadway v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lopez v. Kennecott Copper Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Horn v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API