Bolduc v. MARCALUS MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Lampeón, J.

Defendant’s position in its brief and in oral argument is (1) that plaintiff’s present condition is not compensable; (2) that there was no evidence to support the finding that the plaintiff’s earning capacity had been decreased by the accident; (3) that the award was not computed in accordance with the provisions of the act; (4) that the Court had no right to award a lump-sum.

There was ample evidence from which the Court could find that plaintiff’s accident activated a previously dormant arthritic condition existing in his right knee and that this activation is the cause of…