Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 1985No. 8425SC1189PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The primary question presented is whether the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment for respondents on petitioners’ petition to establish a boundary line.

Summary judgment is proper only if there is no genuine issue of material fact and respondents are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Vassey v. Burch, 301 N.C. 68, 72, 269 S.E. 2d 137, 140 (1980).

In cases involving boundary line disputes, brought under the processioning statutes, the question of what are the termini or boundaries presents a question of law for the court, while the question of where the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Brown v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Batson v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Bishop v. ReinholdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Brown v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ayscue v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Jones v. ArehartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Baker v. MoorefieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API