Legal Opinion

Ayscue v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2018No. COA18-379PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

*136 *2 Emily Urquhart Ayscue ("Ayscue") appeals from an order determining the location of the boundary division line between her property and an adjoining tract. Ayscue also appeals from an order denying her Rule 60 motion for reconsideration. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 60 (2017).

I. Background

This case concerns a disputed boundary line between neighboring tracts of real property, both of which are located along a portion of the Roanoke River. Ayscue, Thomas Mizell Urquhart, Jr., and Betsey Derr Urquhart (collectively, "Plaintiffs") own one tract as tenants-in-common and an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Janu Inc v. Mega HospitalityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  2. Janu Inc v. Mega HospitalityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  3. Woody v. VickreyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. Woody v. VickreyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API