Legal Opinion
Hicks v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 31, 1991No. 90-762CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, alleges that the United States Department of Agriculture caused him to suffer damage to his “financial position, credit, and reputation” by failing to approve his Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) loan application. Plaintiff also seeks damages for defendant’s alleged breach of a commodity loan agreement. Defendant counters that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint because plaintiff’s claims sound in tort.
*649 Factual Background
Plaintiff, a soybean farmer in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Faulkner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Medina Construction, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Hall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Lucas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.