Thomas v. Abbott
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Antrim. (Corbett/J-.)'. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to accept and file Ms bond as a liquor dealer, and brings certiorari to review order denying the writ. The fact's are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The relator filed his petition in the Antrim county circuit court, praying a mandamus to compel the treasurer of that county to accept and file his bond as liquor dealer, and, the writ being denied, he has brought the proceeding to this Court by certiorari. The petition for certiorari does not contain the allegations of error usual in such cases, and we find a voluminous record, raising numberless questions, some of wMch, apparently, are not relied upon, and others of which need no consideration, in view of the settled law of the State. We shall, however, overlook the absence of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Friesner v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Double v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Pinkerton v. StaningerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jay v. O'DonnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Baldwin v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Ehinger v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Koerber v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Rutledge v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.