Legal Opinion

Jay v. O'Donnell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1912No. 22,123PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Prom Howard Circuit Court, William G. Pitrdum, Judge. Application by Michael 0 ’Donnell for license to sell intoxicating liquors, against which Gilbert D. Jay remonstrated. Prom a judgment granting the license, the remonstrant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee applied to the Board of Commissioners of the County of Howard for a license to sell intoxicating liquors as a beverage in the city of Kokomo. Appellant filed a remonstrance, which alleged, in brief, that by order of said board of commissioners a local option election had been held in said city of Kokomo, under the act approved February *2853, 1911 (Acts 1911 p. 8), and that a majority of the legal votes cast in said city at said election was in favor of prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage in said city, and that said board of commissioners so declared the result of…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Gardner v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Prince v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. AdlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Davis v. WardeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Board of Commissioners v. JewettIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Schwartzkopf v. State Ex Rel. FettigIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Cushman v. HusseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API