Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1915No. Calendar No. 26,945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Alger; Fead, J. Mandamus by Frederick J. Baldwin and others against the board of supervisors of Alger county to compel respondents to amend their return of a recount of the ballots cast at a local option election. From an order denying the writ, relators bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Although issues of fact were framed and tried by the court, none of the testimony is returned or made part of the record. The plaintiffs in certiorari (relators) adopt the finding made by the circuit judge as “a true, correct, and adequate statement of the facts relative to this controversy.”

A local option election was held in. Alger county in April, 1915. The board of supervisors canvassed the returns, and from them found that 768 votes had been cast in favor of and 766 votes against prohibition. Petitions for a recount of the votes in several precincts were filed. One asked for a recount of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Giddings v. BlackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People ex rel. Ayres v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. People ex rel. Drake v. Regents of the UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Bradley v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People ex rel. Russell v. Inspectors & Agent of the State PrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amberg v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Rapid Railway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Campbell v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hartley v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Ranney v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API