Ehinger v. Graham
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Mandamus by Louis Ehinger against, William H. Graham, Ingham county clerk, to compel respondent to take necessary steps to hold a local option election in said county. From an order denying the writ relator brings certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
The relator and appellant filed a petition in the circuit court for the county of Ingham on November 23, 1915, praying for a writ of mandamus to be directed to the respondent, requiring him to show cause why he did not proceed in accordance with the statute to submit the following question to the voters of Ingham county:
“Shall the manufacture of liquors and the liquor traffic be prohibited within the county”
—at the next general election for township officers in *134the several townships, villages and cities in said county. From the petition of relator and the answer of respondent we gather the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People ex rel. Chaddock v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Thomas v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Friesner v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Kern v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Attorney General v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Soutar v. St. Clair County Election CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. RistySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Eames v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Durstin v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
- Graham v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916