Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Chief Judge.
Robert L. Mendenhall and CMI Corporation, the exclusive licensee for the United States, as owners of all rights in United States Patents Nos. Re. 31,904 (’904 patent) and 31,905 (’905 patent), sued Cedarapids, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa for infringement. Cedarapids counterclaimed, charging CMI with infringement of United States Patents Nos. 4,165,184 (’184 patent) and 4,318,-619 (’619 patent). Cedarapids also sought declaratory judgments of invalidity, unen-forceability and noninfringement of Mr. Men-denhall’s patents. After a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Texas Instruments Incorporated v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Lsi Logic Corporation, and Vlsi Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. Mustek Systems, Inc. And Mustek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Moba, B v. Staalkat, B v. and Fps Food Processing Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. Diamond Automation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.