Legal Opinion
Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 7, 2008No. 2008-1029, 2008-1030, 2008-1031, 2008-1032, 2008-1059PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
*1357LINN, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent infringement case. Cohesive Technologies, Inc. (“Cohesive”) brought three related actions accusing Waters Corporation (“Waters”) of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,772,874 (the “'874 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 5,919,368 (the “ '368 patent”). In the first action, No. 98-CV-12308, Cohesive accused Waters’s 30 p,m Oasis high-performance liquid chromatography (“HPLC”) columns (the “30 ixm columns”) of infringing the '874 patent. See Cohesive Techs., Inc. v. Waters Corp., 526 F.Supp.2d 84, 88 (D.Mass.2007). In the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Powell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.