Legal Opinion

Philip Davis v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 16, 1955No. 5, Docket 23318PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, riding as a guest in a truck, was injured when the front end of the truck was hit by one of defendant’s passenger trains at a grade crossing.. The appeal is from the judgment entered in plaintiff’s favor on the verdict of a jury; and it is claimed: that the trial judge should have directed a verdict for defendant, because of the alleged failure of plaintiff to establish his freedom from contributory negligence, as required by Vermont law; that the requisite diversity was not established by a fair preponderance of the evidence; and that, for a variety of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DavidSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. OhleSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Goodwin, Admx. v. GastonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  4. Harrington v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  5. Meyette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Steve Kozman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., and Allied Maintenance Corporation, Third-Party and Allied Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Fourth-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Steve Kozman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., and Allied Maintenance Corporation, Third-Party and Allied Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Fourth-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API