Legal Opinion

Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 14, 1984No. 984, Docket 83-7738Published

1Opinion of the Court

737 F.2d 238

Martin KATZ and Louana Katz, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

The GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 984, Docket 83-7738.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued March 30, 1984.

Decided June 14, 1984.

Herbert Rubin, New York City (Howard L. Wexler, David B. Hamm, Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

James A. Gallagher, Jr., Garden City, N.Y. (Robert A. Faller, Moore, Berson, Lifflander & Mewhinney, Garden City, N.Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, KEARSE, and PIERCE, Circuit Judges.

PIERCE, Circuit…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API