Legal Opinion
Martin Katz and Louana Katz v. The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 14, 1984No. 984, Docket 83-7738PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Martin and Louana Katz appeal from an order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Irving Ben Cooper, Judge, entered August 15,1983, granting the motion of defendant The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to prove that, they were New York domiciliaries at the time their claim accrued and consequently had not shown that pursuant to New York’s borrowing statute, N.Y.Civ.Prac.Law § 202 (McKinney 1972), New York’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Palazzo v. CorioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Anthony Sutera v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Genesco Entertainment, a Div. of Lymutt v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- McCann v. Newman Irrevocable TrustCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Marshall Stewart, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Rca Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.