Legal Opinion
In Re Michael P. Doyle
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 12, 2002No. 01-1439 (Serial no. 08/601,101)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Michael P. Doyle appeals the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) affirming the final rejection of claims 54 through 71 of his Reissue Application No, 08/601,101 based on the doctrine of In re Orita, 550 F.2d 1277, 193 U.S.P.Q. 145 (CCPA 1977). Ex parte Doyle, No.2000-0601, slip op. at 12 (December 29, 2000), request for reh’g denied (March 22, 2001). Because the Board erred in extending Orita to affirm the rejection of the pending claims, we reverse and remand.
I
The invention at issue in this case is a method of using chiral catalysts to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating and Packing Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re John KollarCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In Re Elmar W. Weiler and Richard L. MansellCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In re LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In re OritaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re YoumanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- MBO LABORATORIES, INC. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Moaec, Inc. v. Musicip Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.