Legal Opinion

Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating and Packing Inc., and James F. Rennels

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 20, 1985No. Appeal 84-1559PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decision, on remand from this court, of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, which declined to accord appellants any intervening rights under 35 U.S.C. § 252 as to certain infringing products. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

Background

We have before us a sequel to this court’s decision in Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., 731 F.2d 818, 221 USPQ 568 (Fed.Cir.1984). There is no need to repeat all the details of that opinion. However, for purposes of the present appeal a brief review of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Acs Hospital Systems, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Montefiore Hospital and Wells National Services Corporation, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Alden W. Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API