Legal Opinion
Moaec, Inc. v. Musicip Corp.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 30, 2008No. 07-cv-654-bbcPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
This is a civil lawsuit in which plaintiff MOAEC, Inc. alleges that defendants Mu-sicIP Corporation, Imation Enterprises Corporation, Pandora Media, Inc., National Radio Holdings, L.L.C., J. River Inc., All Media Guide, L.L.C. and Napster, L.L.C. are infringing plaintiffs United States Patents numbers: 5,969,283 (the '283 patent); 6,232,539 (the '539 patent); 6,953,886 (the '886 patent); and 7,205,471 (the '471 patent). Jurisdiction is present. 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
The case is before the court on defendant Napster’s motion for partial summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Immersion Corporation v. Htc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016