Legal Opinion

City of Denver v. Bullock

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 1926No. 11,378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Bullock had a decree in the district court quieting his title to lots 29-38, block 15, Lincoln subdivision. The city was a defendant and brings the case here for review.

The plaintiff claimed under a tax deed; the city held liens for improvement taxes which accrued before the tax on which plaintiff’s deed depended. The deed cuts them off, if it is valid; if not they stand. The city is charged with the duty of collecting and distributing these taxes according to law and part of them belongs to her to pay her bonds; she is, then, in a position to question the deed’s validity. Young v. Rohan, 77…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. Colorado CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hamer v. Glenn Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Young v. RohanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  2. City & County of Denver v. MurrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Richardson v. HalbekannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API