Legal Opinion
Wallace Clark & Co., Inc. v. Acheson Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 22, 1976No. 74 Civ. 2812PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant, Acheson Industries, Inc. (“Acheson”), moves pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that summary judgment be awarded in its favor for (1) past due royalty payments under a licensing agreement whereby plaintiff was licensed to manufacture and sell products under claims of defendant’s patent, and (2) future minimum royalty payments due to March 21, 1978, the termination date of the licensing agreement. The aforesaid royalty agreement was entered into simultaneously with the entry of a consent decree wherein Acheson’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- New York Life Insurance v. ViglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Poinciana Hotel of Miami Beach, Inc. v. KasdenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Skil Corp. v. Lucerne Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Tatung Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003