Legal Opinion
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Tatung Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 26, 2003No. 02 Civ. 8107(JSR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAROFF, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38, reprinted at 9 U.S.C.A. § 201 (West 1999) (“Convention”), Lucent Technologies, Inc. and Lucent Technologies GRL, LLC (collectively, “Lucent”) petition to confirm an arbitration award against respondent Tatung Co. In response, Tatung moves to vacate or modify the award, attacking both the neutrality of the arbitration panel and the substance of the award.
The core dispute between the parties concerns a Patent License…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons, W.L.L. v. Toys "R" Us, Inc. Tru (Hk) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Merit Insurance Company v. Leatherby Insurance Company A/K/A Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lucent Technologies Inc. And Lucent Technologies Grl LLC v. Tatung Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004