Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kiesel's Estate v. Bishop

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiff filed in this court a petition for a writ of mandamus which was followed with the issuance of an alternative writ. After the service of the latter the defendants filed a return and answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. State v. Nyssa-Arcadia Drainage Dist.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bliss v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. United States v. AhoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1944
  3. Lawrence Whse., Inc. v. Best Lbr. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2 v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Greulich v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API