Legal Opinion
Clark Investment Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1966No. 19999PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
The National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., subch. VI, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1736-1746a has, as one of its purposes, “to assist in relieving the acute shortage of housing * * * accommodations available to veterans of World War II at prices within their reasonable ability to pay * * 12 U.S.C. § 1738(a). It authorizes the Federal Housing Administration to insure mortgages given as security for loans made to persons who propose to create such housing. This case involves a loan so secured and insured under 12 U.S.C. § 1743.
Pocatello Heights Corporation is the mortgagor;…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. View Crest Garden Apts., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Pauline Rust v. Paul Johnson and Nora Johnson, City of Los Angeles v. Paul Johnson, Nora Johnson, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Landmark Park & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul, a Public Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- United States v. Haddon Haciendas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.