Legal Opinion
United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1970No. 22708PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question whether state redemption statutes should apply when the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) forecloses a mortgage which it has guaranteed. We hold that such statutes do not apply.
The federal statute here involved is Title VI of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1736-1746a. The stated objective of Title VI is “to assist in relieving the acute shortage of housing * * * available to veterans of World War II at prices within their reasonable ability to pay * * * ” 12 U.S.C. § 1738(a). The statute confers authority upon the Secretary…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Small Business Administration v. McClellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. Victory Highway Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Pauline Rust v. Paul Johnson and Nora Johnson, City of Los Angeles v. Paul Johnson, Nora Johnson, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. H. E. Crain and Ethel E. Crain, Husband and Wife, and Coconino County, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Marion H. MacKenzie United States of America v. Engine Service Co., Inc., an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States of America, Huron Towers, Inc. v. Morton L. Scholnick and Seymour Dunitz, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.