Legal Opinion

Connor v. Spellacy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The complaint set forth in substance that on November 7th, 1933, the legal voters of the town and city of Hartford, at a meeting duly called and held, voted to consolidate the then existing school districts within it into a consolidated school district, which consolidation became effective on July 1st, 1934; that on February 21st, 1936, the plaintiff and nineteen other legal voters and taxpayers presented to the mayor a petition requesting the calling of a meeting for the purpose of voting upon the re-establishment of the school districts; that on March 4th, 1936, the mayor notified the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chambers v. LoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Keegan v. Town of ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Town of Huntington v. Huntington Town School CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Walsh v. HineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Arsenal School District v. Consolidated Town & City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. James v. RapportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Regional High School District No. 3 v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. Marshall County Board of Education v. City of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API