Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. James v. Rapport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 22, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiff, on behalf of herself and twenty-three others similarly situated, has brought mandamus to require the defendants, the state teachers’ retirement board, to transfer them to the state teachers’ retirement association under the terms of 25 Special Laws 538, No. 340 (1947). The facts are not in dispute.
The plaintiffs entered the service of the state between 1911 and 1939 as training teachers in the training schools of New Haven. As such they taught both teachers and pupils in the public schools. Their salaries were paid by the state and they were under the supervision and direction…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Gray v. QuintilianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Connor v. SpellacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clark v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- City of New Haven v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Jones v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Public Utilities Control Authority.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Local 1186, AFSCME v. Board of Education of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.