Legal Opinion

Strong v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1994No. 18A05-9306-CR-226PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTEAU, Judge.

Herbert Strong appeals his conviction of Dealing in Cocaine, a Class B felony. He presents two issues:(1) Whether an instruction to the jury defining reasonable doubt amounts to fundamental error; and(2) Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for continuance and motion to withdraw filed by defense counsel the day before trial.

We affirm.

REASONABLE DOUBT INSTRUCTION

Without objection by Strong, the trial court gave the following "reasonable doubt" instruction:

A "reasonable doubt" is a fair, actual and logical doubt that arises in your mind after an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Richard Dunn v. Everett I. Perrin, Jr., Laurence Black v. Edward CoxCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winegeart v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Malone v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Bronaugh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Malone v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Omega R. McCullagh v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API