Legal Opinion

Malone v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1996No. 20A05-9410-CR-398PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

Frederick Malone appeals his burglary conviction. He raises six issues, which we restate as:

1. whether Malone received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to object to hearsay statements relevant to Malone's intent;

2. whether the trial court committed fundamental error by giving an instruction which defined reasonable doubt using the term "moral certainty";

3. whether the trial court's final instructions were unconstitutional because they diluted the State's burden of proof regarding Malone's intent;

4. whether the trial court committed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. Melroe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Winegeart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gravens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. WintersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API