Legal Opinion
Smith v. Brutger Companies
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 23, 1997No. C2-96-600PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed grant of summary judgment in favor of appellants Brutger Companies, Brutger Management Company, and Management Dynamics Company (Brutger) and Hegg Capital Company, Inc. (Hegg) and remanded for trial a negligent misrepresentation claim brought by respondents Jane Smith and her husband Joe Smith (Smiths). The court of appeals concluded that summary judgment was procedurally invalid and that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard when it entered judgment for Brutger and Hegg. We reverse.
*410In the early morning hours of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- M.H. v. Caritas Family ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- TROOIEN v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Sain v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Williams v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Flynn v. American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.