Legal Opinion

Williams v. National Football League

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2009No. 09-2247, 09-2462, 09-2249PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, the National Football League (NFL), Dr. John Lombardo, Independent Administrator of the Policy on Anabolic Steroids and Related Substances, and Adolpho Birch, the NFL’s Vice President of Law and Labor Policy, appeal the district court’s 1 order, concluding that the Minnesota statutory claims alleged by Kevin Williams and Pat Williams of the Minnesota Vikings (collectively, “the Players”) are not preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“section 301” or “LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185. The Players cross-appeal the district…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. National Football League Management Council v. National Football League Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Richard Dent v. NflCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Stephen D. Atwater v. The National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. CNH America LLC v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. Seldin v. Estate of SilvermanNebraska Supreme Court · 2020

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API