Legal Opinion

In Re Special Investigation No. 229

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 28, 1983No. [No. 116, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is yet another case involving the accountant-client privilege. See In Re Special Investigation No. 236, 295 Md. 573, 458 A.2d 75 (1983), for a case argued the same day. This proceeding also involves the investigation by the Attorney General into Medicaid fraud. A subpoena was laid in the hands of an accountant. Those whose papers were affected sought and obtained an order of the Criminal Court of Baltimore quashing the subpoena on the grounds of the accountant-client privilege. The Attorney General appealed to the Court of Special Appeals. On our own motion we issued a writ of certiorari…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Special Investigation No. 236Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. In Re Special Investigation No. 195Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Special Investigation No. 281Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. In Re Special Investigation No. 244Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. BAA, PLC v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. In Re a Special Investigation No. 224Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API