Legal Opinion

In Re Special Investigation No. 244

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 5, 1983No. [No. 117, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*82Smith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.. Menchine, J., dissents and filed a dissenting opinion at page 98 infra.

This is yet another case emanating from the Attorney General’s ongoing investigation of Medicaid fraud in Maryland. A subpoena duces tecum was issued to the custodian of records of a joint venture, which is the landlord of a health care provider. The principal owners of the joint venture also own a significant interest in or participate in the management of two health care providers. The joint venture and its principal owners sought to quash the subpoena. They appealed from an…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Goodwich v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API