Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1991No. 90-387, 90-478PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

Appellants Taylor and Lawrence appeal from their convictions for armed robbery. Lawrence, who was tried and convicted on a theory of aiding and abetting, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence linking him to the acts of the principal offenders. Taylor, tried jointly with Lawrence and a third codefendant who was acquitted, argues that the trial judge erroneously denied his motions for severance on the ground of conflicting defenses, and also contends the judge abused his discretion in rejecting Taylor’s request to submit a voice exemplar without taking the stand…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. McCoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Elliott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Leon Robinson and Shanika Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API