Legal Opinion
In re Juvenile 2004-789-A
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 7, 2006No. 2004-789PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The Unity School District (Unity SD) appeals from orders of the Manchester District Court {Emery, J.) denying its motions to dismiss and to reconsider. At issue is whether the Unity SD or the Manchester School District (Manchester SD) is required to reimburse the Nashua School District for the special education expenses for a juvenile, pursuant to RSA 193:29 (1999). Unity SD argues that the court erred in its interpretation and application of RSA 193:27 (1999). We reverse and remand.
The record supports the following. On October 27, 2003, petitions for abuse and neglect were filed, alleging…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Karch v. BayBank FSBSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Manchester School District v. Crisman Ex Rel. Kimberli M.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Monahan-Fortin Properties, LLC v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Binda v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Grenier v. Barclay Square Commercial Condominium Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greene v. McLeodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- In Re NassarSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- General Electric Co. v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- In re Guardianship of KapitulaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- In re Maxi Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.