Legal Opinion

In re Maxi Drug, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 28, 2006No. 2005-473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.

The petitioners, a group of pharmacies and a pharmacy trade association (pharmacy providers), seek a writ of certiorari. They ask us to declare unlawful a program under which the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), acting as New Hampshire’s Medicaid agency (and referred to variously as “NH Medicaid” or “NH Title XIX”), underpaid pharmacy providers for medical supplies and durable medical equipment (DME) they dispensed to Medicaid recipients as a way of recovering for prior claims DHHS had paid in full but for which Medicare was at least partially liable. We grant the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In re Juvenile 2004-789-ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Petition of EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Maxi Drug North, Inc. v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Gorski Wladyslaw EstateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Massachusetts v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. Petition of Estate of Thea BraitermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. Massachusetts v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API