Legal Opinion

Monahan-Fortin Properties, LLC v. Town of Hudson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 24, 2002No. 2001-702PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The defendant, Town of Hudson (town), appeals from a decision of the Superior Court (Hampsey, J.) barring it from applying its growth management ordinance to the plaintiffs condominium project on the basis that the project was also subject to the town’s impact fee ordinance. See RSA 674:21, V(h) (1996). We reverse.

The record supports the following facts. The plaintiff, Monahan-Fortin Properties, LLC, owns property along the Merrimack River in Hudson for which it sought approval to construct a 101-unit elderly housing condominium project known as Riverwalk. It submitted a site plan application…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Karch v. BayBank FSBSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Union Leader Corp. v. FennimanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Appeal of Estate of Van LunenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  4. Crowley v. FrazierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. Appeal of City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gray v. KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. In re JeromeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Estate of Ireland v. Worcester InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  5. Weare Land Use Ass'n v. Town of WeareSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API