Legal Opinion
Soeken v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 29, 2000No. 00-02 CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (4) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Plaintiff claims that his retirement from the United States Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Officer Corps was involuntary. In its motion to dismiss, defendant contends that this court lacks jurisdiction because plaintiff voluntarily retired in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Scarseth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Klingenschmitt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- McKoy v. SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.