Legal Opinion

Rodwell v. . Rowland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1905PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The maxim stare decisis discussed.

2DissentBrown, J.

This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto to try the title to the office of clerk of the Superior Court of WARREN, and was heard byWebb, J., holding the courts of the Second Judicial District, upon a case agreed, which is in substance as follows: (618)

In November, 1902, W. A. White was elected clerk for four years from 1 December, 1902. He qualified and held the office until September, 1904, when he resigned. The judge of that district then appointed the defendant to the office, in terms providing that he should "fill the unexpired term of W. A.…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Speed v. HartwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. State ex rel. Berge v. LansingNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Adsit v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People Ex Rel. Davies v. CowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  5. People of North Carolina Ex Rel. Cloud v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State ex rel. Patterson v. LentzMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General Ex Rel. Owens v. ChaplinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Smith v. Town of CaroLina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Twichel v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API