Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12355PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Maryland Casualty Company from a judgment for $5,434 against it upon a surety bond.

The appeal is upon the judgment-roll alone and «the contentions made are that the complaint does not state a cause of action and the findings do not support the judgment.

The facts, as disclosed by the findings, are, briefly: That prior to December 17, 1924, defendant E. L. Smith was the owner of the stock of the Foss-Smith Company and was an officer thereof and also the general manager and in direct control of the entire business of said corporation; that during all the times…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blumenthal v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nittler v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Bridges v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Clark v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hogberg v. LandfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. White v. Financial Guarantee Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API