Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Morris. Cherokee superior court. August 10, .1911.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.
Bauhard Brothers brought suit against the makers of a promissory note payable to the order of Bridges & Flora. On the back of it was this entry: “For value received, we hereby warrant the makers of this note financially good on execution. Bridges & Flora.” The defendants demurred to the petition on. the grounds, that it set out no cause of action; that it showed on *474its face that the jdaintiffs had no legal title and were not bona fide holders for value; and that the entry on the note by the payees was not a formal indorsement, but only a guaranty that the makers of the note were good for the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Heard v. Dubuque County BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Kellogg v. Douglas County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Tescher v. MereaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Haug v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Adolph Ramish, Inc. v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Hutson v. RankinIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- National Bank of the Republic v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.