Jones v. Hinton
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Defendants, Earlette Hinton, Angela Palo, Jennifer LaLena and American Travellers Corp. (“defendants”) have filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants argue that plaintiff’s complaint, which contains two counts of defamation, should be dismissed because it was filed after the statute of limitations had run, and because defendants’ acts complained of were privileged and therefore plaintiff has failed to state a claim. However, for the reasonjs set forth below, we find…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Chester County Intermediate Unit v. Pennsylvania Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- United States v. Marisol, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guillen v. National GrangeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Miller v. Group Voyagers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Sterling v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Warminster Township Municipal Authority v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Dolla v. Unicast Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.