Legal Opinion

Guillen v. National Grange

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 3, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2568(AER)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiff, whom the Court granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is representing himself, and has filed oppositions to both motions.

Plaintiff asserts two types of claims. First, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant discriminated against him because of his race while he was employed at and terminated by The National Grange. Second, Plaintiff alleges that following his termination, The National Grange published defamatory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Local 201 Reinforcing RodmenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  2. Jones v. HintonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Yelverton v. Blue Bell, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Washington v. WhiteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Kone v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Hogue v. RoachDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  5. Stewart v. WhiteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API