Legal Opinion

Bluetooth SIG, Inc. v. FCA US, LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 24, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01493Unknown

1Opinion

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 BLUETOOTH SIG, INC., a Delaware 9 corporation, 10 Case No. 2:18-cv-01493-RAJ Plaintiff, 11 ORDER v. 12 FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability 13 company, 14 Defendant. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Before the Court are three motions. Having considered the submissions of the 18 parties, the relevant portions of the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that 19 oral argument is unnecessary. For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude the 20 Expert Report and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Fortune Dynamic, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Eduardo Sandoval-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API