State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
*421{¶ 1} The General Assembly has defined the offense of robbery to require proof of a culpable mental state (or mens rea) for some elements of the offense but not for others. In this appeal, we consider whether the state must prove a culpable mental state with respect to the element contained in R.C. 2911.02(A)(3), that the offender did “[u]se or threaten the immediate use of force against another.” We hold that it need not and that the strict-liability and read-in-recklessness rules of R.C. 2901.21(B) do not apply.
Background
{¶ 2} The Montgomery County Grand Jury indicted appellee, Kevin…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. WharfOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. David ButtsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Lawrence JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Mercedes WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- State v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.