Legal Opinion

State v. Tolliver (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 2014No. 2013-0351PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

*421{¶ 1} The General Assembly has defined the offense of robbery to require proof of a culpable mental state (or mens rea) for some elements of the offense but not for others. In this appeal, we consider whether the state must prove a culpable mental state with respect to the element contained in R.C. 2911.02(A)(3), that the offender did “[u]se or threaten the immediate use of force against another.” We hold that it need not and that the strict-liability and read-in-recklessness rules of R.C. 2901.21(B) do not apply.

Background

{¶ 2} The Montgomery County Grand Jury indicted appellee, Kevin…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. WharfOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. David ButtsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Lawrence JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Mercedes WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. State v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API