Legal Opinion

Mola Development Corp. v. City of Seal Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1997No. G014576PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

Is the mere filing of a lawsuit for administrative mandamus the same as pursuing it to decision? Mola Development Corporation argues it is, but we disagree. Mola filed an action for administrative mandamus to overturn the City of Seal Beach’s quasi-judicial decision to disapprove a vesting tentative map, but voluntarily dismissed it on the eve of trial. That dismissal precludes, we will hold, a suit for damages for a regulatory taking.

There is an obvious and fundamental distinction between initiating mandamus and obtaining a judgment. The Supreme Court tells us “[a] final…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Douglas Miller v. County of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. YKA Industries, Inc. v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. Town of Mammoth LakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Monks v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Jefferson Street Ventures, LLC v. City of IndioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. State Bar of California v. StatileCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API