Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 1994No. 92-74PublishedCited by 306 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

The power of state and local governments to impose ad valorem property taxes upon railroads and other interstate *335carriers has been the source of recurrent litigation under the Commerce Clause and the Due Process Clause. See, e.g., Central R. Co. of Pa. v. Pennsylvania, 370 U. S. 607 (1962); Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Nebraska Bd. of Equalization and Assessment, 347 U. S. 590 (1954); Morgan v. Parham, 16 Wall. 471 (1873). In the case before us, a state property tax is challenged under a federal statute, the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4-R Act). Pub. L. 94-210, 90…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by306 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Lira v. HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

301 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API