Legal Opinion

Jacques Interiors v. Petrak

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1987No. B014827PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUI, J.

Summary

This appeal concerns the liability of a claims adjuster, Edwin Petrak (Petrak), hired by Sentry Insurance Co. (Sentry) to determine Sentry’s contractual obligation as an insurer to the owners of a building damaged by fire. Petrak improperly concealed and distorted evidence regarding his investigation and Sentry, in reliance on the investigation, sued a tenant in the building, Jacques Interiors (Jacques), for subrogation.

During discovery for the subrogation action, what Petrak had done was revealed, and Sentry voluntarily dismissed its cross-complaint against Jacques.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Weaver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Harbor Insurance v. Central National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hutton v. HAFIFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Padres L.P. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Swat-Fame, Inc. v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Ensworth v. MullvainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API