Legal Opinion

Batch v. Town of Chapel Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 1990No. 121PA89PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

This case raises the question of whether the proceeding pursuant to plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Town of Chapel Hill which denied plaintiffs subdivision permit application was properly joined with her cause of action alleging in her complaint constitutional violations and seeking damages, costs, and attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and N.C.G.S. § 40A-8. Also presented is the further question of whether summary judgment in favor of plaintiff was properly granted as to both proceedings. We hold that these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. GasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Batch v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Miranda v. Comisión Estatal de EleccionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
  2. Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Howard v. City of KinstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Bailey & Associates, Inc. v. Wilmington Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API