Legal Opinion
Calkins v. Ponca City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 27, 1923No. 13484PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.
The parties to this cause appeared as plaintiff and defendant in the district court, respectively, as they appear here in this proceeding in error.
Lots 23 and 24, block 40, in the town site of Hartman, a subdivision of the city of Ponca City, Kay county, Okla., and the improvements thereon were at all times herein mentioned the property' of the plaintiff, C. F. Calkins. Two small frame buildings are located on said lots, and have been rented by the plaintiff, one for a grocery store. The photograph of the buildings presented in the record as exhibits revealed the same as most unsightly,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Jones v. City of WilliamsburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Clark v. Atlantic CityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Goodall v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Finkelstein v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- City of Muskogee v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Oklahoma City, Okl. v. DoleseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.