Legal Opinion
Finkelstein v. City of Sapulpa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 20, 1925No. 15094PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion toy
PINKHAM, C.
This was an action instituted ini the district court of Creek county by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the court below, against the city of Sapulpa, to enjoin the enforcement of the provisions of ordinance No. 540, of said city; a copy of the ordinance in question was attached to plaintiff’s petition and made a parti thereof.
Plaintiff alleged in his petition that the defendant is a city of thej first class, and has what is commonly known as the commission and managerial form of goveroiment; that on -the 9th day of July, 1923, the board of commissioners held a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- City of Butte v. PaltrovichMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Calkins v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Duncan Electric & Ice Co. v. City of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. KievmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Baxley v. City of FrederickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Burgum v. HookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Johnson v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Levine v. Board of Adjustment of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.